North Korea's 2 Trillion Yen War
Estimates that North Korea is earning over 2 trillion yen from troop deployment and weapon exports to Russia mean that the UN sanctions regime is effectively collapsing. The war in Ukraine is becoming the largest source of funding for North Korea's nuclear and missile development, fundamentally altering the security environment in East Asia.
── Understand in 3 points ─────────
- • A South Korean government-affiliated think tank estimates North Korea's income from troop deployment and weapon exports to Russia to be over 2 trillion yen (over approximately 14 billion USD).
- • North Korea is dispatching approximately 10,000 to 12,000 soldiers to Russia starting in the latter half of 2024, to participate in combat on the Ukrainian front, including in the Kursk direction.
- • North Korea is exporting large quantities of weapons and ammunition to Russia, including 152mm artillery shells, 122mm rockets, and short-range ballistic missiles (KN-23/KN-25 series).
── NOW PATTERN ─────────
North Korea's "war economy," capitalizing on the crisis of the war in Ukraine, is internally collapsing the cooperative mechanism of the international sanctions regime and accelerating the spiral of conflict in East Asia.
── Probability and Response ──────
• Base case 55% — Continued stalemate on the Ukrainian front, stalled US-Russia ceasefire negotiations, reports of additional North Korean troop deployments, sustained pace of Russian ammunition consumption
• Bull case 15% — Concrete progress in US-Russia ceasefire negotiations, decrease in combat intensity on the Ukrainian front, signs of reduced Russian ammunition imports, diplomatic softening by Putin
• Bear case 30% — Evidence of advanced military technology transfer from Russia to North Korea, North Korea's test launch of a new ICBM or nuclear test, South Korea's decision to provide lethal weapons to Ukraine, rapid escalation of military tensions on the Korean Peninsula
📡 Signal — What Happened
Why it matters: Estimates that North Korea is earning over 2 trillion yen from troop deployment and weapon exports to Russia mean that the UN sanctions regime is effectively collapsing. The war in Ukraine is becoming the largest source of funding for North Korea's nuclear and missile development, fundamentally altering the security environment in East Asia.
- Estimated Income — A South Korean government-affiliated think tank estimates North Korea's income from troop deployment and weapon exports to Russia to be over 2 trillion yen (over approximately 14 billion USD).
- Troop Deployment Scale — North Korea is dispatching approximately 10,000 to 12,000 soldiers to Russia starting in the latter half of 2024, to participate in combat on the Ukrainian front, including in the Kursk direction.
- Weapon Exports — North Korea is exporting large quantities of weapons and ammunition to Russia, including 152mm artillery shells, 122mm rockets, and short-range ballistic missiles (KN-23/KN-25 series).
- Impact on Sanctions — A warning that income from Russia has reached a scale that offsets the effectiveness of international economic sanctions against North Korea.
- Compensation Structure — North Korea is likely receiving cash income from Russia, as well as military technology transfers (satellite, submarine, ICBM-related technology), and in-kind supplies of oil and food.
- UN Sanctions — The UN Security Council's Panel of Experts on North Korea sanctions expired in April 2024 and was not renewed due to Russia's veto, rendering it non-functional.
- North Korea GDP Comparison — North Korea's annual GDP is estimated at 30-40 billion USD (Bank of Korea estimate), making the income of over 2 trillion yen an exceptional amount, equivalent to 30-50% of its GDP.
- South Korea's Response — The South Korean government has characterized North Korea's military cooperation with Russia as a "grave challenge to the international order" and is considering countermeasures, including providing weapons to Ukraine.
- Violation of International Law — North Korea's troop deployment and weapon exports both clearly violate UN Security Council resolutions, but effective action is difficult due to Russia being a permanent member of the Security Council.
- Casualties — Ukrainian authorities estimate North Korean military casualties to be in the thousands. North Korea is reportedly indicating its intention for additional troop deployments.
- Russia-DPRK Treaty — In June 2024, President Putin and Chairman Kim Jong Un signed a "Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Treaty," which includes mutual defense clauses equivalent to a military alliance.
- Ammunition Export Volume — The cumulative volume of artillery shells and ammunition exported from North Korea to Russia is estimated to be over 5 million rounds, compensating for a significant portion of Russia's monthly consumption.
The estimate that North Korea is earning over 2 trillion yen from troop deployment and weapon exports to Russia is an indicator of a historical turning point, showing that the international non-proliferation and sanctions regime, built over more than 30 years since the end of the Cold War, is structurally collapsing.
To understand the root of this situation, one must first look back at North Korea's economic and sanctions history. With the collapse of the Soviet Union and China's market liberalization in the 1990s, North Korea effectively lost its largest patron during the Cold War. The "Arduous March," a great famine in the mid-1990s, killed an estimated hundreds of thousands, and the economy suffered devastating damage. To survive this extreme situation, the Kim Jong Il regime accelerated nuclear and missile development as a "trump card for regime guarantee." Since its first nuclear test in 2006, the UN Security Council gradually strengthened sanctions, and Resolution 2397 in 2017 imposed comprehensive sanctions aimed at cutting off 90% of North Korea's export revenue.
However, structural weaknesses were inherent in the sanctions regime. First, China and Russia, both permanent members of the Security Council, were reluctant to fully implement sanctions and maintained economic ties with North Korea under the table. Second, North Korea diversified its illicit foreign currency earning methods, including cryptocurrency theft (hacking by the Lazarus Group), counterfeit currency, illegal drugs, and ship-to-ship transfers. Third, the UN Panel of Experts, tasked with verifying and monitoring the effectiveness of sanctions, always lacked authority and resources.
Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 created a decisive crack in this fragile sanctions regime. As the war dragged on, Russia faced a severe ammunition shortage and turned its attention to North Korea's vast stockpiles of ammunition. For North Korea, this was a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. The Soviet-standard artillery shells and ammunition accumulated during the Cold War were aging, but Russia's demand prioritized quantity over quality, and North Korea's inventory transformed overnight into a "strategic asset."
The Kim Jong Un-Putin summit in September 2023 (at Russia's Vostochny Cosmodrome in the Far East) symbolized the full-scale military cooperation. In June 2024, a "Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Treaty" was signed at the Pyongyang summit, effectively reviving a military alliance. This was the re-establishment of a military alliance-like relationship for the first time in about 60 years since the 1961 Sino-Soviet-DPRK Treaty of Friendship.
Why has the figure of 2 trillion yen come to light at this particular time? It is because North Korea's military contribution to Russia has entered a new phase, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Initially, the focus was on exporting artillery shells and ammunition, but from the latter half of 2024, it expanded to include the dispatch of 10,000 troops, and further escalated to the provision of short-range ballistic missiles. The deployment of combatants is a new channel for North Korea to earn foreign currency, and at the same time, it brings military dividends in the form of combat experience. North Korean soldiers are experiencing the realities of modern warfare on the Ukrainian front—drone warfare, electronic warfare, urban warfare—and this experience will qualitatively improve the capabilities of the North Korean military in the event of a contingency on the Korean Peninsula.
Historically, this structure is a resurgence of the "proxy war economy" of the Cold War era. In the Korean War of the 1950s, China dispatched "volunteer forces" and the Soviet Union supplied weapons. In the 1960s and 70s, Cuba dispatched tens of thousands of soldiers to various parts of Africa and received economic and military aid from the Soviet Union. The pattern of a small country providing military forces to a great power's war in exchange for economic and military benefits is a classic model of international relations.
However, what fundamentally distinguishes the modern North Korea-Russia relationship from the past is that it is military cooperation between nuclear-weapon states. Potential technology transfers that North Korea could obtain from Russia—ICBM re-entry vehicle technology, nuclear submarine technology, reconnaissance satellite technology—could qualitatively leapfrog North Korea's strategic nuclear capabilities and fundamentally alter the strategic balance in East Asia. While the 2 trillion yen figure is shocking, the true threat lies in the invisible technology transfer.
The delta: The estimate of over 2 trillion yen in income from North Korea's military cooperation with Russia is the first numerical indication that the UN sanctions regime has been "quantitatively" nullified. The premise that sanctions would delay North Korea's nuclear development has collapsed; instead, the war in Ukraine has become the largest source of funding and technology for nuclear and missile development. The security order in East Asia is transitioning from a sanctions-based non-proliferation regime to a new phase centered on deterrence and alliance realignment.
🔍 Reading Between the Lines — What the Reports Don't Say
The background to the South Korean government-affiliated think tank's publication of the large figure of "over 2 trillion yen" is a clear political intention to shape domestic public opinion for a new South Korean government to proceed with providing lethal weapons to Ukraine after the impeachment of Yoon Suk-yeol. The purpose is to impress upon the public the "scale" of North Korea-Russia military cooperation, rather than the precise accuracy of the figure itself. Furthermore, the timing of this estimate's release coincides with a period when the United States is considering reviewing its support for Ukraine, indicating South Korea's willingness to assume a new role as a pillar of Ukraine support in place of the US. What truly deserves attention is not the amount, but the "value of military technology transfer" included in the estimate, which implies an implicit acknowledgment that North Korea's nuclear and missile capabilities are irreversibly improving.
NOW PATTERN
Failure of Coordination × Crisis Exploitation × Spiral of Conflict
North Korea's "war economy," capitalizing on the crisis of the war in Ukraine, is internally collapsing the cooperative mechanism of the international sanctions regime and accelerating the spiral of conflict in East Asia.
Intersection of Dynamics
The three dynamics of "Failure of Coordination," "Crisis Exploitation," and "Spiral of Conflict" form a complex structure that mutually reinforces each other. This interaction is why the current situation should be viewed not merely as a temporary deviation, but as a structural transformation of the international order.
First, "Failure of Coordination" creates the preconditions for "Crisis Exploitation." The dysfunction of the UN Security Council has rendered sanctions against North Korea ineffective, creating an environment where North Korea can openly engage in military transactions with Russia. If the sanctions regime were functioning properly, North Korea's ammunition exports and troop deployments would have immediately led to strengthened international sanctions, but Russia's veto power has neutralized the Security Council, giving North Korea a de facto "carte blanche."
Second, the outcomes of "Crisis Exploitation" fuel the "Spiral of Conflict." The over 2 trillion yen in income and military technology North Korea obtains from Russia will enhance North Korea's nuclear and missile capabilities, fundamentally changing the security perceptions of neighboring countries. South Korea, Japan, and the United States will be forced to strengthen countermeasures, leading to an arms race and intensified conflict across the region.
Third, the "Spiral of Conflict" further deepens the "Failure of Coordination." The more intense the conflict in East Asia becomes, the more reluctant China will be to strictly enforce North Korea sanctions (the collapse of North Korea is the worst-case scenario for China), and Russia will further deepen its military cooperation with North Korea. The room for international cooperation will narrow even further, making the reconstruction of the sanctions regime even more difficult.
At the intersection of these three dynamics lies the symbolic meaning of the "2 trillion yen" figure. It is not merely an amount of money, but an indicator that simultaneously visualizes the degree of sanctions regime collapse, the profitability of crisis exploitation, and the energy source of the spiral of conflict. Once this complex structure is established, it becomes extremely difficult to resolve individual dynamics separately, and improvement in the situation cannot be expected without a comprehensive approach—the end of the war in Ukraine, the establishment of a new security framework, and the design of alternative non-proliferation mechanisms.
📚 History of Patterns
1960s-1970s: Cuba's Troop Deployment to Africa and Soviet Compensation
A model of a "proxy war economy" where a small country provides military forces for a great power's proxy war and receives economic and military aid as compensation.
Structural similarities with the current situation: Cuba deployed a cumulative total of 380,000 people to Angola, Ethiopia, and other countries, receiving billions of dollars in aid annually from the Soviet Union. This economic model disappeared after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and Cuba fell into a severe economic crisis. This demonstrates the fragility of an economic structure dependent on the survival of a patron state.
1980s: North Korea's Weapon Exports to Iran during the Iran-Iraq War
Expansion of weapon export business by a sanctioned country, exploiting surging demand from warring parties.
Structural similarities with the current situation: North Korea exported large quantities of Scud missiles and artillery shells to Iran, earning foreign currency. This successful experience established North Korea's business model as a "weapon exporting state" and became the prototype for its current dealings with Russia.
1990s-2000s: Pakistan's A.Q. Khan Nuclear Proliferation Network
A national nuclear technology proliferation business that exploited gaps in sanctions and non-proliferation regime monitoring.
Structural similarities with the current situation: A.Q. Khan, the father of Pakistan's nuclear program, illicitly sold centrifuge technology to Iran, Libya, and North Korea. This is an example of an allied nation (Pakistan was a US ally in the war on terror) internally undermining the non-proliferation regime, structurally similar to Russia's current destruction of the sanctions regime.
2014: Western Sanctions Against Russia After Crimea Annexation and China's Economic Support
A pattern where a sanctioned country finds alternative economic partners, thereby nullifying the effect of sanctions.
Structural similarities with the current situation: After the 2014 sanctions, Russia rapidly deepened its economic ties with China and mitigated the impact of sanctions by redirecting energy exports. This demonstrated the lesson that sanctions are limited in effectiveness as long as alternative partners exist. North Korea is similarly circumventing sanctions through Russia as an alternative partner.
2023-2024: North Korea's Large-Scale Acquisition of Crypto Assets through Cyber Theft
A "digital sanctions evasion" where a sanctioned country acquires foreign currency in cyberspace, an unregulated domain.
Structural similarities with the current situation: North Korea reportedly stole approximately 1.6 billion USD in crypto assets through hacking in 2023. While traditional sanctions target physical trade and financial transactions, cyberspace remains a "blind spot" for sanctions. Coupled with military transactions with Russia, North Korea has established multiple channels for sanctions evasion.
Patterns Revealed by History
The common patterns revealed by historical precedents are clear. Sanctions regimes are always weakened by the existence of "alternative partners," and extraordinary circumstances like war serve as the greatest catalyst for sanctions evasion. Cuba's troop deployments to Africa, North Korea's weapon exports to Iran, Pakistan's nuclear proliferation network, Russia's pivot to China after Crimea—all are instances where sanctioned states (or destroyers of the non-proliferation regime) exploited the demands of great powers or geopolitical interests to evade or nullify sanctions.
The current North Korea-Russia relationship is more serious than any past case in that it is a "composite type" combining elements of all these precedents. Troop provision (Cuban model), weapon exports (Iran-Iraq War model), technology transactions (Khan network model), alternative partners (post-Crimea model), and cyber theft (digital model) are all proceeding simultaneously, and the challenge to the sanctions regime has reached a multidimensional and unprecedented scale. History suggests that once such complex sanctions evasion is established, it cannot be resolved by external pressure alone, but must await changes in the geopolitical environment itself (such as the end of the Cold War or the collapse of patron states).
🔮 Next Scenarios
If the war in Ukraine does not reach a ceasefire or freeze by 2026 and continues at a low intensity, North Korea's weapon exports and troop deployments to Russia will also continue at the current pace. In this case, North Korea will continue to stably earn hundreds of billions of yen annually, and cumulative income by 2027 will significantly exceed the estimated 2 trillion yen. New sanctions resolutions in the UN Security Council will be impossible due to Russia's veto, and the existing sanctions regime will continue to be hollowed out. South Korea will gradually expand indirect military aid to Ukraine (e.g., artillery shell provision via third countries) but will maintain a cautious stance on direct provision of lethal weapons. The United States will condemn North Korea-Russia military cooperation but will limit itself to additional unilateral sanctions, without implementing fundamental countermeasures. North Korea will use technology obtained from Russia to launch satellites and test ICBMs, and tensions in East Asia will gradually increase. Japan will seek to accelerate the achievement of its 2% GDP defense spending target and expedite the development of counterattack capabilities. In this base scenario, the situation will proceed as an extension of the status quo, with no dramatic improvement or rapid deterioration, and a state of "managed crisis" will become normalized.
Implications for Investment/Action: Continued stalemate on the Ukrainian front, stalled US-Russia ceasefire negotiations, reports of additional North Korean troop deployments, sustained pace of Russian ammunition consumption
If the war in Ukraine reaches some form of ceasefire agreement by 2026, North Korea's "war boom" for Russia will rapidly shrink. If a ceasefire is achieved, Russia's ammunition demand will drastically decrease, making large-scale imports of artillery shells and ammunition from North Korea unnecessary. Deployed soldiers will also be gradually withdrawn, and North Korea's sources of income will significantly decrease. Furthermore, if Russia seeks to re-enter the international community after a ceasefire, a reduction in military cooperation with North Korea may be presented as a condition for normalizing relations with the West. In this case, North Korea will again face economic isolation, and the pressure of sanctions will relatively recover. However, even in the optimistic scenario, military technology already transferred cannot be "rolled back," and the qualitative improvement of North Korea's nuclear and missile capabilities is irreversible. Also, the possibility that Russia will secretly continue technological cooperation with North Korea even after a ceasefire cannot be ruled out. The realization of the optimistic scenario presupposes the establishment of comprehensive ceasefire negotiations between the US and Russia, and as of March 2026, the outlook for this is extremely uncertain.
Implications for Investment/Action: Concrete progress in US-Russia ceasefire negotiations, decrease in combat intensity on the Ukrainian front, signs of reduced Russian ammunition imports, diplomatic softening by Putin
A scenario where North Korea-Russia military cooperation further escalates and enters a qualitatively new phase. Specifically, Russia seriously transfers ICBM re-entry vehicle technology and nuclear submarine-related technology to North Korea, leading to a qualitative leap in North Korea's strategic nuclear capabilities. North Korea conducts new ICBM test launches or a 7th nuclear test, and the security environment in East Asia rapidly deteriorates. South Korea proceeds with direct provision of lethal weapons to Ukraine, and Russia takes retaliatory measures against South Korea (cyberattacks, sanctions on South Korean companies, additional technology provision to North Korea), causing the spiral of conflict to become uncontrollable. In an even more pessimistic scenario, North Korea intensifies military provocations on the Korean Peninsula based on its combat experience in Russia, increasing the risk of accidental conflict. The rise of nuclear armament arguments in Japan and South Korea, declining trust in extended nuclear deterrence from the US, and changes in China's strategic calculations could destabilize the entire security order in East Asia. This scenario could materialize if the war in Ukraine prolongs and intensifies, and North Korea's strategic ambitions simultaneously expand.
Implications for Investment/Action: Evidence of advanced military technology transfer from Russia to North Korea, North Korea's test launch of a new ICBM or nuclear test, South Korea's decision to provide lethal weapons to Ukraine, rapid escalation of military tensions on the Korean Peninsula
Key Triggers to Watch
- South Korea's decision to provide lethal weapons to Ukraine: April-September 2026
- North Korea's test launch of a new ICBM or 7th nuclear test: Within 2026
- Start or breakdown of US-Russia ceasefire negotiations for Ukraine: March-December 2026
- Confirmation of additional large-scale troop deployment from North Korea to Russia (second wave): April-June 2026
- Confirmation of advanced military technology transfer from Russia to North Korea via satellite imagery or intelligence: Within 2026
🔄 Tracking Loop
Next Trigger: Announcement of the new South Korean government's Ukraine policy (scheduled for April-May 2026) — The decision on providing lethal weapons will be a turning point determining the next stage of the spiral of conflict.
Continuation of this Pattern: Tracking Theme: Deepening North Korea-Russia military cooperation and collapse of the sanctions regime — The next milestones are the new South Korean government's decision on weapon provision to Ukraine (first half of 2026) and North Korea's next ballistic missile launch.
>How do you read this? Participate in Prediction →
