Bitcoin Poised to Surpass ¥10 Million
The full-scale entry of institutional investors such as hedge funds and pension funds is an irreversible shift that transforms Bitcoin from a speculative asset into an "institutional asset class," rewriting its price formation mechanism, regulatory environment, and the position of individual investors.
── Understand in 3 points ─────────
- • The market is discussing the possibility of Bitcoin reaching a price range of ¥10 million to ¥12 million by early 2026.
- • Major U.S. hedge funds are accelerating their moves to incorporate Bitcoin into 2-5% of their portfolios.
- • Pension funds, including Japan's GPIF (Government Pension Investment Fund), have begun considering allocations to crypto assets.
── NOW PATTERN ─────────
The institutionalization of Bitcoin is a classic example of path dependency, forming a self-reinforcing loop of ETF approval → institutional entry → regulatory development → further entry, creating a structure that is extremely difficult to reverse.
── Probability and Response ──────
• Base case 50% — Daily net inflows into ETFs remain stable at an average of $300-500 million. The FRB cuts interest rates at the expected pace. Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA) announces a schedule for legal revisions. Bitcoin dominance maintains 55-65%.
• Bull case 25% — The FRB implements a significant interest rate cut of 50bp or more. The U.S. or major countries officially announce strategic Bitcoin reserves. GPIF explicitly includes crypto assets in its alternative asset allocation. Days with daily net ETF inflows exceeding $1 billion become frequent.
• Bear case 25% — The SEC announces a statement significantly strengthening crypto asset regulations. VIX surges (above 30) due to geopolitical crises. Security incidents at major custody providers. The FRB signals a hawkish pivot. Large-scale outflows from Bitcoin ETFs (over $1 billion weekly).
📡 THE SIGNAL — What Happened
Why it matters: The full-scale entry of institutional investors such as hedge funds and pension funds is an irreversible shift that transforms Bitcoin from a speculative asset into an "institutional asset class," rewriting its price formation mechanism, regulatory environment, and the position of individual investors.
- Price — The market is discussing the possibility of Bitcoin reaching a price range of ¥10 million to ¥12 million by early 2026.
- Institutional Investors — Major U.S. hedge funds are accelerating their moves to incorporate Bitcoin into 2-5% of their portfolios.
- Pension Funds — Pension funds, including Japan's GPIF (Government Pension Investment Fund), have begun considering allocations to crypto assets.
- ETF — Since the approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in the U.S. in January 2024, cumulative net inflows have exceeded $40 billion.
- Regulation — Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA) aims to revise the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA) by 2026 to include crypto assets.
- Supply — The Bitcoin halving in April 2024 reduced miner rewards from 6.25 BTC to 3.125 BTC, halving supply pressure.
- Demand Structure — Institutional capital inflows via Grayscale and BlackRock ETFs sometimes reach an average of $500 million daily.
- Macro Environment — Expectations of the FRB's interest rate cutting cycle beginning are re-accelerating capital inflows into risk assets across the board.
- Geopolitics — The prolonged U.S.-China rivalry and concerns about a unipolar dollar system are strengthening Bitcoin's position as "digital gold."
- Infrastructure — Institutional-grade custody services (e.g., BitGo, Coinbase Custody) are advancing, significantly lowering barriers to entry for large investors.
- Corporate Finance — Following MicroStrategy, publicly traded companies like Tesla and Meta Platforms are increasingly incorporating Bitcoin into their treasury reserves.
- Japanese Market — Monthly trading volume on crypto asset exchanges in Japan is increasing by more than double year-on-year from late 2025.
The question of whether Bitcoin will break ¥10 million (equivalent to approximately $67,000-$70,000) transcends mere price prediction. It signifies the culmination of a structural transformation where the experiment of "state-independent currency," which began with Satoshi Nakamoto's white paper in 2008, is formally integrated into the existing financial order.
To understand this transformation, we must first consider Bitcoin's history in three eras.
The first era (2009-2016) was the "experimental phase for technologists and libertarians." As symbolized by the collapse of Mt. Gox (2014), Bitcoin was regarded as a speculative token without institutional backing, and traditional financial institutions dismissed it as "fraud" or a "bubble." Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan declared Bitcoin a "fraud" in 2017, but the seeds of that statement were sown in the first era.
The second era (2017-2023) was the "era of speculation and narratives." Through cycles such as the 2017 crypto bubble, the 2020-2021 DeFi boom, and the 2022 FTX collapse, the market experienced dramatic fluctuations. Crucially, two structural changes were quietly underway during this period. First, the CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange) listed Bitcoin futures (2017), opening a channel for institutional investors to first access Bitcoin in a regulated market. Second, the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) functioned as a de facto ETF, and pension funds and family offices began to gain indirect exposure to Bitcoin.
The third era (2024-present) is the "era of institutionalization" that we are witnessing right now. In January 2024, the U.S. SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) approved spot Bitcoin ETFs from 11 companies, including BlackRock, Fidelity, and Invesco. This decision was not merely the authorization of a financial product; it signified Bitcoin's formal recognition as a "regulated investment asset." Within 12 months of approval, cumulative net inflows into these ETFs exceeded $40 billion, significantly surpassing the record set by gold ETFs in their first year post-approval.
Why are institutional investors accelerating their entry "now"? There are three structural factors.
First, changes in the macroeconomic environment. With the FRB expected to enter an interest rate cutting cycle from late 2024 and a prolonged low-interest rate environment, Bitcoin's appeal as an inflation hedge has relatively increased. As returns from traditional 60/40 portfolios (60% stocks, 40% bonds) decline, research is accumulating that a 2-5% allocation to Bitcoin as "digital gold" improves portfolio diversification.
Second, the maturation of regulatory infrastructure. Institutional-grade services have been developed in the areas of custody, compliance, and auditing. As of 2025, Bitcoin custody balances exceeded $100 billion, and insured cold storage became standard. This significantly lowered legal and operational barriers for pension funds and insurance companies with fiduciary duties.
Third, geopolitical structural changes. The prolonged U.S.-China rivalry, financial sanctions after Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and instability in the Middle East have exposed the vulnerabilities of a unipolar dollar system. Parallel to central banks increasing their gold reserves, Bitcoin is gaining status as a "non-sovereign asset." El Salvador's adoption of Bitcoin as legal tender (2021) was symbolic, but more sophisticated forms of state-level holdings are being discussed from 2025 onwards.
In the Japanese market, discussions on revising GPIF's investment policy also suggest a turning point. At the end of 2025, GPIF indicated a policy to consider "expanding allocation to alternative assets," and crypto assets emerged as one of the candidates. Even 0.5% of Japan's approximately ¥200 trillion in pension assets would amount to ¥1 trillion, and such an announcement alone could have a significant impact on the Bitcoin market.
This "institutionalization" is irreversible. Once an entity with fiduciary responsibility incorporates Bitcoin into its portfolio, the accountability of "why not invest in Bitcoin?" spreads to other institutions. This closely resembles the dynamics when hedge funds were integrated into pension portfolios in the late 1990s.
The delta: Bitcoin has irreversibly transformed from a "speculative token" into an "institutional asset to be incorporated into institutional investors' portfolios." The convergence of three stages—ETF approval, maturation of custody infrastructure, and the start of pension fund consideration—is fundamentally changing the supply and demand structure.
🔍 BETWEEN THE LINES — What the News Isn't Saying
Behind the surge in reports of institutional investor entry lies a clever media strategy by ETF issuers. For BlackRock and Fidelity, the narrative of "accelerating institutionalization" itself is a marketing tool to promote capital inflows into their own ETFs, creating a self-reinforcing loop between demand and media coverage. Furthermore, reports of Japan's GPIF "considering" crypto reflect an underlying political tug-of-war between the Financial Services Agency (FSA) and the pension industry, indicating a considerable distance before actual investment execution. What truly warrants attention is not the pension fund itself, but whether GPIF's entrusted asset managers (trust banks and asset management companies) have begun making small allocations to Bitcoin ETFs based on their own discretion. This movement is likely occurring ahead of any official announcements.
NOW PATTERN
Path Dependency × Winner Takes All × Chain of Contagion
The institutionalization of Bitcoin is a classic example of path dependency, forming a self-reinforcing loop of ETF approval → institutional entry → regulatory development → further entry, creating a structure that is extremely difficult to reverse.
Intersection of Dynamics
The three dynamics of path dependency, winner-takes-all, and chain of contagion form a self-amplifying system that mutually reinforces itself.
When path dependency takes effect, once established institutional frameworks (ETFs, custody, regulations) become irreversible, solidifying the foundation for winner-takes-all. As Bitcoin enjoys a regulatory monopoly as the sole "institutionally recognized crypto asset," institutional funds concentrate on Bitcoin, widening the gap with other crypto assets.
This winner-takes-all structure further accelerates the chain of contagion. The more Bitcoin is established as the overwhelming winner, the more "risk of being left behind" is recognized by institutions and countries, accelerating the chain of entry. FOMO is not just a phenomenon for individual investors. Institutional FOMO, or the "fear of underperforming against benchmarks," is far more structural and persistent than that of individuals.
Furthermore, the wider the chain of contagion spreads, the stronger path dependency becomes. The more institutions that enter and the more countries that develop regulations, the astronomically higher the cost of the option to "ban Bitcoin" becomes. It is at the intersection of these three dynamics that the structural inevitability of Bitcoin breaking ¥10 million lies.
However, this self-reinforcing loop also harbors inherent risks. If contagion progresses too rapidly, it can lead to an accumulation of leverage and overheating valuations, potentially causing the loop to reverse due to external shocks (sudden regulatory changes, geopolitical crises). The FTX collapse in 2022 was an example of this reversal, but in an institutionalized market in 2026, the scope and depth of impact from a similar shock would be wider and deeper.
📚 PATTERN HISTORY
Late 1990s: Integration of Hedge Funds into Pension Portfolios
Hedge funds, initially criticized as "speculative and dangerous," rapidly spread among pension and university endowments following the success pioneered by David Swensen of the Yale University Endowment. The accountability of "why not allocate to hedge funds?" emerged.
Structural similarity to the present: The institutionalization of a new asset class rapidly chains after the first influential "seal of approval" is given. BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF approval is equivalent to Swensen's role.
2004: Listing of Gold ETF (SPDR Gold Shares: GLD)
Despite gold's thousands of years of history, it was difficult for institutional investors to include it in their portfolios until the "package" of an ETF was provided. After GLD's listing, gold prices more than tripled in five years.
Structural similarity to the present: Ease of investment (accessibility) drives prices more than an asset's intrinsic value. Bitcoin ETFs are bringing the same structural boost to crypto assets as gold ETFs did.
2013: Bank of Japan's Unprecedented Monetary Easing and GPIF's Asset Allocation Review
The Bank of Japan's quantitative easing led to a decline in domestic bond yields, forcing GPIF to expand its allocation from a domestic bond-heavy portfolio to foreign equities and alternative assets. GPIF's move spread to other pension funds, structurally changing the risk asset allocation of Japanese institutional investors.
Structural similarity to the present: An ultra-low interest rate environment is the most powerful force pushing institutional investors into risk assets, and this "yield-seeking" pressure is driving allocations to Bitcoin.
2017: CME Bitcoin Futures Listing and Subsequent Bubble Collapse
The listing of Bitcoin futures by CME, a "legitimate" exchange, opened the entry path for institutional investors for the first time. However, custody infrastructure was undeveloped at the time, leading to an 80% decline in 2018.
Structural similarity to the present: Institutionalization at a stage with insufficient institutional infrastructure can actually accelerate the formation and collapse of bubbles. The institutionalization from 2024-2026 is qualitatively different in that it is accompanied by the maturation of custody and regulatory infrastructure.
2020-2021: MicroStrategy's Bitcoin Treasury Strategy
CEO Michael Saylor converted corporate cash reserves into Bitcoin, initially criticized as "reckless," but the stock price surged more than tenfold. Tesla and Square followed suit, making Bitcoin holdings in corporate treasuries a trend.
Structural similarity to the present: When the "first mover" succeeds, imitation rapidly chains. The wave of institutionalization is progressively rising from individuals → corporations → asset management firms → pension funds, and is currently in its final stage.
Patterns Revealed by History
The pattern shown by historical precedents is clear. The institutionalization of a new asset class proceeds in three stages: (1) the first influential proponent succeeds, (2) regulated investment vehicles (ETFs, futures) are established, and (3) "fear of missing out" spreads among institutions. In the case of gold ETFs (GLD), the price of gold tripled in five years after its listing. The integration of hedge funds into pensions became an industry standard 10 years after the success of the Yale University Endowment. Bitcoin entered the second stage with ETF approval in 2024 and is approaching the critical point of the third stage (inter-institutional contagion) in 2025-2026.
However, history also issues a warning: "institutionalization at a stage with undeveloped infrastructure accelerates bubbles." The collapse of the bubble after the CME futures listing in 2017 is that lesson. While the current institutionalization is qualitatively different in that it is accompanied by the maturation of custody and regulation, the risks of leverage accumulation and speculative overheating always exist. The pattern teaches that "institutionalization brings price increases, but the path is not linear."
🔮 NEXT SCENARIOS
Bitcoin will break ¥10 million by the end of March 2026 and trade in the ¥9 million to ¥12 million range. Capital inflows into U.S. ETFs will continue, but at a slightly slower pace. FRB interest rate cuts will proceed gradually as expected, providing a moderate tailwind for risk assets overall.
In Japan, discussions on the FSA's revision of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA) will progress, but the bill's enactment will be delayed until late 2026 or later. GPIF will maintain a cautious stance on direct investment in crypto assets, sticking to its position of being in the "research and study phase." However, some of GPIF's entrusted asset management institutions may begin making small allocations to Bitcoin ETFs.
Trading volume on Japanese domestic exchanges will continue to increase, and new individual investor entry will accelerate. However, tax reform (separate taxation) will not be included in the 2026 tax reform outline and will be carried over to the following year or later.
Volatility will slightly decrease compared to 2025 but will still significantly exceed traditional assets. One to two correction phases of around 15-20% will occur, but institutional investors' "buy the dip" will provide support, maintaining the long-term upward trend.
Investment/Action Implications: Daily net inflows into ETFs remain stable at an average of $300-500 million. The FRB cuts interest rates at the expected pace. Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA) announces a schedule for legal revisions. Bitcoin dominance maintains 55-65%.
Bitcoin will break ¥12 million by the end of March 2026 and show a rapid surge, approaching ¥15 million. There are multiple catalysts for this optimistic scenario.
First, the FRB adopts a faster-than-expected pace of interest rate cuts, with the policy rate falling below 3.0%. Concerns about economic slowdown accelerate capital inflows into risk assets, and Bitcoin receives a double benefit as both "digital gold" and a "growth asset."
Second, strategic Bitcoin reserves by major national governments materialize. Either a Bitcoin Strategic Reserve Bill passes the Senate in the U.S., or other major countries (e.g., Germany, Singapore) officially begin holding Bitcoin at a national level. This "state entry" would signal a paradigm shift for the market.
Third, GPIF in Japan officially announces a pilot allocation to crypto assets. Even if the amount is 0.1% (approximately ¥200 billion), the symbolic meaning of a pension fund investing in crypto assets is immense, rapidly accelerating the entry of other Japanese institutional investors.
Fourth, Bitcoin's network effects strengthen further, and its practicality as a payment method improves with the spread of the Lightning Network. This reinforces both its "store of value" and "medium of exchange" value propositions.
Investment/Action Implications: The FRB implements a significant interest rate cut of 50bp or more. The U.S. or major countries officially announce strategic Bitcoin reserves. GPIF explicitly includes crypto assets in its alternative asset allocation. Days with daily net ETF inflows exceeding $1 billion become frequent.
Bitcoin remains below ¥8 million by the end of March 2026, or it breaks ¥10 million only to sharply decline afterward. This scenario is underpinned by multiple risk factors.
First, the possibility of a sudden change in the U.S. regulatory environment. A change in SEC chairmanship or political moves to strengthen crypto asset regulations could halt new ETF approvals or tighten regulatory requirements for existing ETFs. In particular, stablecoin regulations could worsen overall sentiment in the Bitcoin market.
Second, geopolitical shocks. Escalating tensions in the Taiwan Strait or an expansion of the Russia-Ukraine conflict could trigger a wave of risk-off sentiment. Just as Bitcoin temporarily fell by over 30% at the start of Russia's invasion in 2022, in extreme risk-off situations, selling for liquidity takes precedence over the "digital gold" narrative.
Third, Bitcoin's inherent technological risks. Over-reporting of concerns about encryption due to advances in quantum computing could cool market sentiment. Furthermore, scenarios where security incidents at major exchanges or custody providers erode institutional investor confidence cannot be ruled out.
Fourth, a "re-inflation" scenario where the FRB halts interest rate cuts or pivots to rate hikes. If inflation proves more persistent than expected and interest rates remain high, risk assets across the board, including Bitcoin, would be pressured. If leverage accumulated in late 2025 unwinds, a sharp decline of 20-30% is also conceivable.
Investment/Action Implications: The SEC announces a statement significantly strengthening crypto asset regulations. VIX surges (above 30) due to geopolitical crises. Security incidents at major custody providers. The FRB signals a hawkish pivot. Large-scale outflows from Bitcoin ETFs (over $1 billion weekly).
Key Triggers to Watch
- FRB FOMC meeting: extent of interest rate cuts and future guidance: March 18-19, 2026 (next FOMC), then every 6 weeks
- Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA) announces amendments to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA) for crypto assets: April-June 2026 (during the ordinary Diet session)
- GPIF announces the definition and scope of "alternative assets" in its 2026 fiscal year investment plan: April 2026 (at the start of the fiscal year)
- Progress in U.S. Bitcoin Strategic Reserve Bill congressional deliberation: First half of 2026
- Sustained changes in daily net inflows into spot Bitcoin ETFs (signal for trend reversal): Continuous monitoring (weekly data)
🔄 TRACKING LOOP
Next Trigger: FOMC March 18-19, 2026 — The FRB's interest rate cut magnitude and dot plot are the most crucial events determining the direction of risk assets, including Bitcoin.
Continuation of this pattern: Tracking Theme: Speed of Bitcoin Institutionalization Spread — Next milestones are GPIF's announcement of its 2026 fiscal year investment policy (April 2026) and the timing of the FSA's submission of the FIEA amendment bill to the Diet.
>How do you read it? Participate in the prediction →
