KelpDAO Breaks Ties with LayerZero, Adopts Chainlink
⚡ What Happened
Decentralized staking protocol KelpDAO announced that it suffered a hack of approximately $292 million, attributing responsibility to LayerZero, and stated that it would switch its cross-chain infrastructure to Chainlink. This highlights concerns about the reliability of cross-chain technology and could significantly damage LayerZero's reputation in the market. Attention will now turn to whether other projects will undertake similar infrastructure reviews or if LayerZero will implement measures to restore trust.
KelpDAO's announcement that it suffered a hack of approximately $292 million, attributing responsibility to LayerZero, and switching its cross-chain infrastructure to Chainlink, is a critical signal regarding the reliability and security of cross-chain technology in the Web3 ecosystem. Historically, cross-chain bridges have been targets of hacks amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars, shaking trust between projects each time. KelpDAO's action this time carries more significance than a mere technical change and could undermine market trust in major cross-chain providers like LayerZero. Furthermore, the switch to competitor Chainlink will accelerate the industry-wide trend of demanding more robust security measures. This event serves as a reminder of how difficult and important securing decentralized infrastructure is, and it is highly likely that other projects will also be compelled to review their infrastructure choices.
🔍 While reports emphasize KelpDAO's attribution of responsibility to LayerZero, they do not touch upon the specific legal or technical basis for this "responsibility," LayerZero's counterarguments, or detailed discussions regarding responsibility sharing. In reality, large-scale exploits like this are often complex cases involving not just a single protocol, but also compound vulnerabilities, deficiencies in smart contract audits, and user negligence. KelpDAO's statement can be interpreted as a strategic move by a victimized project to send a strong message to the market, clarifying "where responsibility lies" for the sake of restoring trust and protecting users. This likely aims to alleviate user anxiety and emphasize the reliability of its new partner, Chainlink. For LayerZero, this "breakup" could potentially spread to other major partners, and its response will significantly impact its future business.
📰 Source: CRYPTO TIMES
🧭 Why This Matters Now
domain=crypto
🔮 Next Scenarios
🎯 Incentive Map
| Player | True Incentive | Underlying Weakness | Predicted Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| KelpDAO | Restoring user and investor trust, project survival and growth, minimizing reputational damage through blame shifting. | Fear of capital outflow and loss of trust due to a large-scale hack, maintaining market positioning. | By publicly attributing responsibility to LayerZero and announcing the migration to Chainlink, emphasizing its position as a victim and demonstrating a commitment to new security measures. |
| LayerZero | Maintaining protocol reliability, preventing other partners from defecting, protecting market share. | Fundamental distrust in cross-chain technology security, comparison with past hacking incidents. | First, take time to investigate the situation and determine the cause, and issue a cautious statement to avoid unnecessary contention. Alternatively, explore negotiations with KelpDAO behind the scenes. |
| Chainlink | Expanding market share, weakening competitors, highlighting the superiority of its own products (e.g., CCIP). | Industry distrust towards general security risks of cross-chain bridges, concern about exposure of its own technology's vulnerabilities. | Welcome KelpDAO's migration and conduct promotions emphasizing that its own infrastructure is more secure. |
⚠️ Pre-Mortem — Conditions for this Prediction to Fail
- LayerZero immediately issues a specific counter-statement, with legal or technical details, against KelpDAO's claims.
- LayerZero acknowledges KelpDAO's attribution of responsibility but claims the cause lies in KelpDAO's implementation errors or smart contract vulnerabilities, not its own protocol.
- LayerZero breaks its silence and issues a joint statement as a result of behind-the-scenes negotiations with KelpDAO, blurring the lines of responsibility.
Fear-Setting / When this prediction fails
- This probability fails if LayerZero issues a press release or blog post within 72 hours directly stating that KelpDAO's accusation of responsibility is factually incorrect or unfounded.
- This probability fails if LayerZero's legal team publicly announces an intent to pursue legal action against KelpDAO for defamation or misrepresentation regarding the hack.
- This probability fails if a prominent LayerZero executive makes a public statement on social media or in an interview explicitly denying LayerZero's culpability for the hack in response to KelpDAO's claims.
Hit Condition: By May 10, 2026, L
Read more
Toranpu Cai Pan Suo Nidui Chu Suru Fa Yan Zui Gao Cai Guan Shui Wei Xian Pan Jue Gayao Rasusan Quan Nojun Heng
U.S. Supreme Court judged that the customs duty under Trump's IEEPA (International Emergency Economic Authority Act) was different from the US Supreme Court's 6 to 3, and over $13.4 billion was covered. Trump said, “We have to deal with the court”, and openly attack two judges appointed by ourselves
Ri Ben No Zi Zhu Fang Wei Fa An Zhan Hou 80Nian Noan Quan Bao Zhang Tabugabeng Rerugou Zao Li Xue
FASTRead 1 minute The Japanese government submitted the draft of the Defense Force Enhancement Law to the National Assembly is the pro。。 of the largest security paradigm shift since the establishment of the Peace Const。tion in 。. As the structural changes in the U.S.-China confrontation, nuclear threats in
Deepening of Russian-Iranian Military Cooperation — “Double-front pressure” structure
FASTRead 1 minute President Zeleスキー’s afflicted military cooperation between Russia and Iran to demonstrate that the Ukrainian War has evolved into a “two-front pressure” system that works structurally with the Middle East, rather than just European regional disputes. If this cooperation is established, the west side of the security
Gao Shi Shou Xiang No Ji Shu Zi Yuan Wai Jiao Ji Zhong Ri Ri Ben Gaaienerugidi Zheng Xue Nojie Jie Dian Womu Zhi Sugou Zao Zhuan Huan
FASTRead 1 minute Prime Minister Takaichi met with the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry. This is a strategic signal positioning Japan at the intersection of three mega-trends: AI defense technology, energy security, and European regunry. ── ───────── * • On March
本サイトの記事は情報提供・教育目的のみであり、投資助言ではありません。記載されたシナリオと確率は分析者の見解であり、将来の結果を保証するものではありません。過去の予測精度は将来の精度を保証しません。特定の金融商品の売買を推奨していません。投資判断は読者自身の責任で行ってください。 This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Scenarios and probabilities are analytical opinions, not guarantees of future outcomes. Past prediction accuracy does not guarantee future accuracy. We do not recommend buying or selling any specific financial instruments.
予測トラッカーを見る View Prediction Track Record